Saturday, January 18, 2014

ポッドキャストの評価基準(ひょうかきじゅん) Criteria for Evaluating Video Podcasts

Below is a list of evaluation criteria created by last years' students. If you want to add something, leave comments on this blog post.

1. Language
Proper grammar, natural, good pronunciation, complexity of sentences, variety of grammar patterns and vocabulary, clearly spoken, Need to use words we have learned

2. Content
Entertaining, creative, easy to understand, informative, original, funny, unique, meaningful, educational, comical, catchy, clear message, attractive, amusing, relatable, engaging (sometimes visually), memorable, fluidity of scenes, quality of film, research and good thoughts is extra credit, emotional

3. Presentation
Decent, good, and sufficient editing (not necessarily professional looking), music, well-lit setting, some visuals, good sound quality, aesthetically pleasing, organized, acting, communicating your message, steady camera work, good script, compelling, good set design

4.  Consideration
Appropriate length, understandable language to listeners, (English if necessary as a subtitle), thoughtful, sound quality, appropriate lengthpodcasts should engage both Western and Japanese audiences

5. Process
All group members are involved, teamwork, logistical planning, equal participation, list a cast (crew credit ), fun

1 comment:

  1. Ricardo's Angels wants to add that evaluation of podcasts should not be greatly swayed by technical limitations - we must keep in mind that not all groups will have access to the same materials or the appropriate skill set to make something super professional looking. Content should be more important than form.
    Also, podcasts should engage both Western and Japanese audiences.

    ReplyDelete